Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring

Zhang Yiran; Ma Xuanlong; Quan Haoli; Zeng Hesheng; Chen Yufeng

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring

Zhang Yiran, Ma Xuanlong, Quan Haoli, Zeng Hesheng, Chen Yufeng

Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 10, Issue 4)

Received: 9 May 2022 Accepted: 26 July 2022 Published: 29 July 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Geological hazard monitoring can predict geological hazard to a certain extent, so that relevant measures can be taken to reduce the damage of human and financial resources. Therefore, the quality of geological hazard monitoring is particularly important. In order to effectively improve the quality of geological hazard monitoring, the environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are deeply explored in this paper. Firstly, the characteristics of environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are described in detail. Secondly, this paper also introduces the environmental geophysical methods commonly used in geological hazard monitoring, such as electric exploration, seismic method, magnetic method and other methods, and provides relevant suggestions and suggestions for these methods, so as to provide certain help for geological hazard monitoring. This paper introduces the main applications of electrical prospecting, seismic method, gravitational method, radioactive prospecting, magnetic method and geophysical well logging. Some examples include the application scope and application results of DC resistivity method, magnetotelluric method and wide-field electromagnetic method, the method layout and application results of seismic survey methods in seismic method, Radon measurement results in radioactive exploration, and the application scope and application results of imaging method in geophysical well logging. Finally, this paper expects the development form and future development trend of geological hazards monitoring, and expects that the geophysical exploration methods can be more widely used in geological hazards monitoring.

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
Page(s)	92-100
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Geological Hazard, Hazard Monitoring, Environmental Geophysical Methods

References

[1]	C. S. Zhang, M. L. Wu, and Y. C. Zhang, “Method and prospect of geological hazard risk assessment,” Journal of Natural hazards, 2003, pp. 96-102.
[2]	H. M. Tang, X. S. Lin, H. K. Chen, and F. Tang, “Risk zoning assessment of geological hazard in Wanzhou area, Chongqing City,” The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2004, pp. 1-5.
[3]	L. Ming, H. Tang, and S. Ye, “Research on Chain Rule of Typical Geological hazard,” Journal of Catastrophology, 2008, pp. 1-5.
[4]	W. Yue, “Application of ARM9 processor in geological hazard detection apparatus,” Electronic Measurement Technology, 2007.
[5]	Y. Chen, “Application of remote sensing technology in geological hazard investigation and detection,” Automation & Instrumentation, 2017.
[6]	S. Jiang, “Study of landslide geological hazard prediction method based on probability migration,” Natural Hazards, 2021, pp. 1-10.
[7]	S. A. Ugwu, and J. I. Nwosu, “Effect of Waste Dumps on Groundwater in Choba using Geophysical Method,” Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management, 2009.
[8]	M. Schmutz, R. Guérin, O. Maquaire, M. Descloitres, J. J. Schott, and Y. Albouy, “Geophysical method contribution to the Super Sauze (South France) flowslide knowledge,” Proc. int. symp. on Landslides, 2000.
[9]	A. Panjamani, and T. G. Sitharam, "Evaluation of Low Strain Dynamic Properties using Geophysical Method: A Case Study," 2008.
[10]	N. Martakis, A. Tselentis, S. Kapotas, and E. Karageorgi, "Passive Seismic Tomography a complementary geophysical method: successful case study. " Japanese Colleges of Technology Education Journal, 2003.
[11]	T. Chen, W. U. Hong, H. Huang, and R. Sun, "Application of Environmental Geophysical Prospecting in Environmental Quality Investigation of Reclaimed Land," Meteorological and Environmental Research, 2020.
[12]	R. Rodriguez. “Mapping karst solution features by the integrated geophysical method,” Engineering and Environmental Problems in Karst Terrane, 2018.
[13]	L Wang, “Application of Geophysical Methods in Environmental Protection,” Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2003.
[14]	R. C. Benson, and L. Yuhr, “Geophysical Methods for Environmental Assessment,” Geoenvironment ASCE, 2013.
[15]	R. G. Bingham, E. C. King, A. M. Smith, and Pritchard, H. D. Glacial, “Geomorphology: Towards a convergence of glaciology and geomorphology,” Progress in Physical Geography, 2010, pp. 327-355.
[16]	Y. E. Teng-Fei, Y. L. Gong, C. X. Lu, and Y. Chen, "Application of Environmental Geophysical Methods in the Investigation of Contaminated Sites." Journal of University of South China (Science and Technology), 2008.
[17]	L. P. Chegbeleh, J. A. Akudago, M. Nishigaki, and S. Edusei, “Electromagnetic geophysical survey for groundwater exploration in the voltaian of northern ghana.” Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 2009, pp. 1-16.
[18]	L. V. Eppelbaum, “Remote Operated Vehicle Geophysical Survey Using Magnetic and VLF Methods: Proposed Schemes for Data Processing and Interpretation,” Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society of America, 2008.
[19]	Maillet, and Raymond, “The Fundamental Equations of Electrical Prospecting,” Geophysics, 1947, pp. 29.
[20]	D. Z Oehler, and B. K. Sternberg, “Seepage-induced anomalies, false anomalies, and implications for electrical prospecting,” AAPG Bulletin, 1984, pp. 1121-1145.
[21]	C. C. Yin, Y. H. Liu, A. H. Weng, and D. Y. Jia, “Research on marine controued-source electromagnetic method airwave,” Journal of Jilin University, 2012, pp. 1506-1520.
[22]	K. O. O. mosanya, and T. M. Alves, “A 3-dimensional seismic method to assess the provenance of Mass-Transport Deposits (MTDs) on salt-rich continental slopes (Espírito Santo Basin, SE Brazil),” Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, pp. 223-239.
[23]	G. G. Walton, “Three-Dimensional Seismic Method,” Geophysics, 2012, pp. 417.
[24]	K. O. Omosanya, and T. M. Alves. "A 3-dimensional seismic method to assess the provenance of Mass-Transport Deposits (MTDs) on salt-rich continental slopes (Espírito Santo Basin, SE Brazil)." Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2013, pp. 223-239.
[25]	S. L. Qu, Y. X. Ji, X. Wang, Wang, X. L, and G. Q. Shen, "Seismic method for using full-azimuth P-wave attribution to detect fracture." Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2001.
[26]	M. Ge, H. Wang, H. R. Hardy, and R. Ramani, "Void detection at an anthracite mine using an in-seam seismic method." International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, pp. 201-212.
[27]	T. Engelsfeld, Franjo. Šumanovac, and N. Pavin, "Investigation of underground cavities in a two-layer model using the refraction seismic method." Near Surface Geophysics, 2008, pp. 221-231.
[28]	S. Reiser, J. P. Herrmann, and A. Temming, “Thermal preference of the common brown shrimp (Crangon crangon, L.) determined by the acute and gravitational method,” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2014, pp. 250-256.
[29]	E. Newman, and R. Penrose, "An Approach to G. ravitational Radiation by a Method of Spin Coefficients." Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1963, pp. 998-998.
[30]	M. Shigeo, and M. Yuji, "Basement topography of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal-An application of gravitational method to the survey of a tectonic basin in the Himalayas." Korean Journal of Food & Nutrition, 1980, pp. 80-87.
[31]	K. Kainulainen, and V. Marra, "Accurate modeling of weak lensing with the stochastic gravitational lensing method." Physical Review D, 2011.
[32]	M. S Reford, “Magnetic method: Geophysics, 1980.
[33]	R. Z. Levitin, V. V. Snegirev, A. V. Kopylov, A. S. Lagutin, and A. Gerber, “Magnetic method of magnetocaloric effect determination in high pulsed magnetic fields,” Journal of Magnetism & Magnetic Materials, 1997, pp. 223-227.
[34]	F. Li, and J. Kosel, “A Magnetic Method to Concentrate and Trap Biological Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, pp. 2854-2856.
[35]	H. L ee, H. Suh, and T. Chang, “Rapid Removal of Green Algae by the Magnetic Method,” Environmental Engineering Research, 2012, pp. 151-156.
[36]	D. O. Seevers. "A Nuclear Magnetic Method For Determining The Permeability Of Sandstones." Spwla Annual Logging Symposium, 1966.
[37]	L. Ferrara, M. Faifer, M. Muhaxheri, and S. Toscani, "A magnetic method for non destructive monitoring of fiber dispersion and orientation in steel fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Part 2: Correlation to tensile fracture toughness." Materials & Structures, 2012, pp. 591-598.
[38]	F. Li, and J. Kosel, "A Magnetic Method to Concentrate and Trap Biological Targets." IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, pp. 2854-2856.
[39]	G. V. Bida, "Differential Magnetic Method of Nondestructive Testing and Phase Analysis." Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 2002, pp. 21-35.
[40]	M. Radu, J. Valy, A. F. Gourgues, F. L. Strat, and A. Pineau, "Continuous magnetic method for quantitative monitoring of martensitic transformation in steels containing metastable austenite." Scripta Materialia, 2005, pp. 525-530.
[41]	J. Miles, "Temporal variation of radon levels in houses and implications for radon measurement strategies. " Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2001, pp. 369-76.
[42]	T. V. Ramachandran, B. Y. Lalit, and U. C. Mishra, "Measurement of radon permeability through some membranes." International Journal of Radiation Applications & Instrumentation Part D Nuclear Tracks & Radiation Measurements, 1987, pp. 81-84.
[43]	S. A. Talha, R. Meijer, R. Lindsay, R. T. Newman, P. P. Maleka, and Hlatshwayo. "In-field radon measurement in water: a novel approach." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2010, pp. 1024-1031.
[44]	M. C. Robe, A. Rannou, and B. J. Le, "Radon Measurement in the Environment in France." Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1992, pp. 455-457.
[45]	D. Vuchkov, K. Ivanova, Z. Stojanovska, B. Kunovska, and V. Badulin, "Radon measurement in schools and kindergartens (Kremikovtsi Municipality, Bulgaria)." Romanian Journal of Physics, 2013, pp. S328-S335.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zhang Yiran, Ma Xuanlong, Quan Haoli, Zeng Hesheng, Chen Yufeng. (2022). Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 10(4), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zhang Yiran; Ma Xuanlong; Quan Haoli; Zeng Hesheng; Chen Yufeng. Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2022, 10(4), 92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zhang Yiran, Ma Xuanlong, Quan Haoli, Zeng Hesheng, Chen Yufeng. Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2022;10(4):92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13,
  author = {Zhang Yiran and Ma Xuanlong and Quan Haoli and Zeng Hesheng and Chen Yufeng},
  title = {Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {92-100},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  abstract = {Geological hazard monitoring can predict geological hazard to a certain extent, so that relevant measures can be taken to reduce the damage of human and financial resources. Therefore, the quality of geological hazard monitoring is particularly important. In order to effectively improve the quality of geological hazard monitoring, the environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are deeply explored in this paper. Firstly, the characteristics of environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are described in detail. Secondly, this paper also introduces the environmental geophysical methods commonly used in geological hazard monitoring, such as electric exploration, seismic method, magnetic method and other methods, and provides relevant suggestions and suggestions for these methods, so as to provide certain help for geological hazard monitoring. This paper introduces the main applications of electrical prospecting, seismic method, gravitational method, radioactive prospecting, magnetic method and geophysical well logging. Some examples include the application scope and application results of DC resistivity method, magnetotelluric method and wide-field electromagnetic method, the method layout and application results of seismic survey methods in seismic method, Radon measurement results in radioactive exploration, and the application scope and application results of imaging method in geophysical well logging. Finally, this paper expects the development form and future development trend of geological hazards monitoring, and expects that the geophysical exploration methods can be more widely used in geological hazards monitoring.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring
AU  - Zhang Yiran
AU  - Ma Xuanlong
AU  - Quan Haoli
AU  - Zeng Hesheng
AU  - Chen Yufeng
Y1  - 2022/07/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 92
EP  - 100
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
AB  - Geological hazard monitoring can predict geological hazard to a certain extent, so that relevant measures can be taken to reduce the damage of human and financial resources. Therefore, the quality of geological hazard monitoring is particularly important. In order to effectively improve the quality of geological hazard monitoring, the environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are deeply explored in this paper. Firstly, the characteristics of environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are described in detail. Secondly, this paper also introduces the environmental geophysical methods commonly used in geological hazard monitoring, such as electric exploration, seismic method, magnetic method and other methods, and provides relevant suggestions and suggestions for these methods, so as to provide certain help for geological hazard monitoring. This paper introduces the main applications of electrical prospecting, seismic method, gravitational method, radioactive prospecting, magnetic method and geophysical well logging. Some examples include the application scope and application results of DC resistivity method, magnetotelluric method and wide-field electromagnetic method, the method layout and application results of seismic survey methods in seismic method, Radon measurement results in radioactive exploration, and the application scope and application results of imaging method in geophysical well logging. Finally, this paper expects the development form and future development trend of geological hazards monitoring, and expects that the geophysical exploration methods can be more widely used in geological hazards monitoring.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Zhang Yiran

Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, China
Ma Xuanlong

Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, China
Quan Haoli

Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, China
Zeng Hesheng

Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, China
Chen Yufeng

Geophysical Exploration Brigade of Hubei Geological Bureau, Wuhan, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zhang Yiran, Ma Xuanlong, Quan Haoli, Zeng Hesheng, Chen Yufeng. (2022). Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 10(4), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zhang Yiran; Ma Xuanlong; Quan Haoli; Zeng Hesheng; Chen Yufeng. Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2022, 10(4), 92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zhang Yiran, Ma Xuanlong, Quan Haoli, Zeng Hesheng, Chen Yufeng. Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2022;10(4):92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13,
  author = {Zhang Yiran and Ma Xuanlong and Quan Haoli and Zeng Hesheng and Chen Yufeng},
  title = {Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {92-100},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20221004.13},
  abstract = {Geological hazard monitoring can predict geological hazard to a certain extent, so that relevant measures can be taken to reduce the damage of human and financial resources. Therefore, the quality of geological hazard monitoring is particularly important. In order to effectively improve the quality of geological hazard monitoring, the environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are deeply explored in this paper. Firstly, the characteristics of environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are described in detail. Secondly, this paper also introduces the environmental geophysical methods commonly used in geological hazard monitoring, such as electric exploration, seismic method, magnetic method and other methods, and provides relevant suggestions and suggestions for these methods, so as to provide certain help for geological hazard monitoring. This paper introduces the main applications of electrical prospecting, seismic method, gravitational method, radioactive prospecting, magnetic method and geophysical well logging. Some examples include the application scope and application results of DC resistivity method, magnetotelluric method and wide-field electromagnetic method, the method layout and application results of seismic survey methods in seismic method, Radon measurement results in radioactive exploration, and the application scope and application results of imaging method in geophysical well logging. Finally, this paper expects the development form and future development trend of geological hazards monitoring, and expects that the geophysical exploration methods can be more widely used in geological hazards monitoring.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Research on Environmental Geophysical Methods in Geological Hazards Monitoring
AU  - Zhang Yiran
AU  - Ma Xuanlong
AU  - Quan Haoli
AU  - Zeng Hesheng
AU  - Chen Yufeng
Y1  - 2022/07/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 92
EP  - 100
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20221004.13
AB  - Geological hazard monitoring can predict geological hazard to a certain extent, so that relevant measures can be taken to reduce the damage of human and financial resources. Therefore, the quality of geological hazard monitoring is particularly important. In order to effectively improve the quality of geological hazard monitoring, the environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are deeply explored in this paper. Firstly, the characteristics of environmental geophysical methods in geological hazard monitoring are described in detail. Secondly, this paper also introduces the environmental geophysical methods commonly used in geological hazard monitoring, such as electric exploration, seismic method, magnetic method and other methods, and provides relevant suggestions and suggestions for these methods, so as to provide certain help for geological hazard monitoring. This paper introduces the main applications of electrical prospecting, seismic method, gravitational method, radioactive prospecting, magnetic method and geophysical well logging. Some examples include the application scope and application results of DC resistivity method, magnetotelluric method and wide-field electromagnetic method, the method layout and application results of seismic survey methods in seismic method, Radon measurement results in radioactive exploration, and the application scope and application results of imaging method in geophysical well logging. Finally, this paper expects the development form and future development trend of geological hazards monitoring, and expects that the geophysical exploration methods can be more widely used in geological hazards monitoring.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download